Left ventricular (LV) strain, specifically global longitudinal strain (GLS), has emerged as a powerful and sensitive echocardiographic parameter for assessing myocardial function. While traditionally relying on ejection fraction (EF) for evaluating LV systolic function, GLS offers a more nuanced understanding of subtle myocardial dysfunction, even before changes are evident in EF. This is particularly crucial in populations at risk for cardiotoxicity, such as patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. This article will delve into the intricacies of normal LV strain, focusing on GLS, its measurement, interpretation, and clinical significance, particularly in the context of risk stratification for chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.
Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function: Beyond Ejection Fraction
For many years, ejection fraction (EF), the percentage of blood ejected from the left ventricle with each contraction, served as the primary indicator of LV systolic function. However, EF is a relatively insensitive marker of early myocardial dysfunction. It reflects the overall pumping capacity of the heart but does not provide information about the regional or global myocardial deformation that underlies the pumping process. Subtle alterations in myocardial contractility, often preceding significant changes in EF, can be detected using strain imaging techniques. This is where GLS comes into play.
Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS): A Superior Measure of Myocardial Function
GLS measures the percentage change in length of the myocardium during systole. It quantifies the longitudinal deformation of the LV myocardium, reflecting the contractile performance of the entire ventricle. Unlike EF, which is a volume-based measurement, GLS is a deformation-based measure, providing a more sensitive assessment of myocardial function. A decreased GLS value indicates impaired myocardial contractility. The advantage of GLS lies in its ability to detect subtle abnormalities in myocardial function before changes in EF become apparent, making it a valuable tool for early detection of cardiotoxicity and other forms of myocardial dysfunction.
Normal Ranges of Left Ventricular Strain: A Meta-Analysis Perspective
Establishing a definitive "normal" range for GLS is challenging due to variations in echocardiographic equipment, image acquisition techniques, and analysis methods. Numerous studies have attempted to define reference ranges, often resulting in slightly differing values. Meta-analyses are crucial in synthesizing these data and providing a more robust estimate of normal GLS values. Several meta-analyses have been conducted to determine the normal range of GLS, considering various factors such as age, sex, and body size. These studies generally report a normal GLS range of -19% to -20%, although some studies report slightly wider or narrower ranges. The variability highlights the importance of using age- and sex-specific reference ranges whenever available, and ideally, comparing an individual's GLS to their own baseline values whenever longitudinal monitoring is employed.
Echocardiographic Reference Ranges of Global Longitudinal Strain: The Importance of Standardization
The lack of standardization in echocardiographic acquisition and analysis protocols contributes significantly to the variability in reported GLS reference ranges. The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) has published guidelines recommending standardized protocols for GLS measurements to improve reproducibility and comparability across different centers. Adherence to these guidelines is crucial for accurate interpretation of GLS values and for ensuring the reliability of clinical decisions based on these measurements. This includes careful attention to image quality, appropriate choice of analysis software, and consistent application of measurement techniques.
current url：https://pzotdp.cr774.com/products/normal-lv-strain-12054